Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inger!
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Inger! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBOOK, unsourced and I can't find any significant coverage. The author has no Wikipedia entry. The article consists only of a few lines of plot summary. Lennart97 (talk) 09:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 09:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:NBOOK, have been unable to find any reviews of this book. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.