Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ido Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ido Wikipedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. f eminist 09:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. f eminist 09:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. f eminist 09:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List_of_Wikipedias. Searches found only trivial coverage in RSes. Fails notability. In 2007 this large group Afd kept this article although there was no discussion of Ido in particular. Gab4gab (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List_of_Wikipedias - No evidence of notability however consensus is more or less to redirect these so redirect. –Davey2010^Talk 18:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Wikipedias. Internet source searches are only providing passing mentions; does not meet GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.