Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal ring bundle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideal ring bundle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded twice due to lack of notability and WP:DICDEF/WP:HOWTO-level content. Fails WP:GNG according to Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) and the anonymous first prodder, since all Google Scholar hits are co-authored by one V. Riznyk. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 12:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 12:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as second prodder. All sourcing seems to trace back to the same person. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The articles on this topic were all either sole authored or coauthored by one person and the citations are all self-citations. This does not seem to have any take up. — Charles Stewart (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.