Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoxton Mini Press

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 18:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoxton Mini Press

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, and pure advert by WP:SPA. None of the references have any substance. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Szzuk (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Szzuk: Which of the Criteria for speedy deletion do you feel pertain to this article? North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G11. Promotional page. Szzuk (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.