Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Munaf Kapadia. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. Essentially an advert. scope_creepTalk 16:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/redirect to Munaf Kapadia, the author of the book, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. The content of this article written by Dial911 (talk · contribs) can be used to expand the author's article. The book was published on 10 April 2021 and received coverage just today on 2 May 2021 as I make this comment:
    • Mathai, Anjuly (2021-05-02). "Munaf Kapadia: From selling ads at Google to selling samosas at The Bohri Kitchen". The Week. Archived from the original on 2021-05-02. Retrieved 2021-05-02.

      The article notes, "What is compelling about the book is how brutally honest Kapadia has been. ... Unlike most “passion-to-paycheque” startup stories, Kapadia’s does not exactly end on a high note. With the pandemic, his business took a hit. Many outlets had to be shut down and he had to let go of some of the staff."

    If How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas continues to receive significant coverage and reviews, I would support undoing the redirect and restoring the article since the book would meet Wikipedia:Notability (books), which says:

    A book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:

    1. The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.
    Cunard (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.