Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosein Soleymani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hosein Soleymani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There seems to be a duplicate at Hossein soleimani (with lowercase s) Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out, Oiyarbepsy. ~~I flagged it for speedy deletion per A10~~. Warm regards, Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 02:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization redirect seemed appropriate. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 02:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I simply see nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 03:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 10:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the Persian Wikipedia article has a long list of references (which I am not qualified to evaluate) and that this academic source romanises the name as "Hossein Soleimani". 86.24.88.241 (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The ip's comment is well noted, but like them, I am not qualified to evaluate the Persian Wiki's references. I waited through two relists to see if there was an interested person who could comment on the veracity of the Arabic sources, but alas, no takers. So I am left with the humble tools afforded those of us on English Wikipedia. Using those, like the nom and the above editor, I could find nothing to show this person meets either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I very much doubt that the sources cited in the Persian Wikipedia article are in Arabic. 86.24.88.241 (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.