Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Kuttner deities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cthulhu Mythos deities. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 10:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Kuttner deities

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A while ago User:Susmuffin PRODed this but the prod was evidently declined. I suggest merging parts of this to List of Great Old Ones and redirecting the rest to Cthulhu Mythos deities, as I don't think this entry meets WP:GNG or WP:NLIST (and my BEFORE did not help; this grouping does not seem to exist in reliable sources). See similar outcomes for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clark Ashton Smith deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lin Carter deities. PS. Please do not hard delete this, WP:SOFTDELETE will do just fine, I just had to dig in IA to fill in blanks in the List of Great Old Ones. PPS. Also, interested editors may want to comment at Talk:Cthulhu_Mythos_deities#Two_lists_of_Great_Old_Ones_need_merging, TIA. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I don't really see why this has to be an AfD discussion rather than a normal merge discussion (which I had suggested in the past, but noone commented), but I support a merge to the suggested target lists as appropriate. Daranios (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom and the above. This really didn't need a relist. Jclemens (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article and there is not significant coverage.RamotHacker (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ah, found it again. As there is some discussion about coverage: The Enciclopedia de los Mitos de Cthulhu covers some of the entities on this list, and mentions alls of them. Daranios (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just realized that this is a version of the Encyclopedia Cthulhiana. Anyway, it is a secondary source, and in spite of the introductory sentence of the Wikipedia article, to the best of my knowledge, this is not a role-playing game supplement. Daranios (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or delete - The topic fails WP:GNG. I don't really think the content needs to be retained seeing as it appears to be all plot information. I'm not sure if there are Lovecraft scholars that do deep dives into the lore, but it otherwise seems like most of it is way too in-depth to need to bother covering here. TTN (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and/or redirect per nom. Another article that looks to be unverified, likely based on original research from primary sources. Nothing independent to meet the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.