Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Pick (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete, default to Keep. (NAC) RMHED (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Heather Pick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
subject of local interest only. This is not "Columbus, Ohio-pedia! Pepe Machao (talk) 05:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per earlier AfD nomination and overall notability. This is not a wikipedia only for people known by the general public but for everyone with notability. Heather Pick has notability. Thats my final word.--MarkusBJoke (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep-The sources I linked in the last AFD show that she was notable for more than just being a news anchor. Her story garnered enough attention from other news agencies to show notability. Other issues can be fixed with cleanup. Umbralcorax (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment- in addition to the articles I linked in the previous AFD, Pixelface also linked several other articles, which go further to show notability. Umbralcorax (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting comment Clicking on "view AFD" in the log takes you to the first AFD (which was closed "no consensus"). This might have discouraged some from commenting. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete the article reads like a memorial, while I feel there is insufficient proof as to her notability. Not one of the sources cited are independent of the subject, AFAICT. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The newspaper articles (including the one I list below) seem to be independent. Hobit (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as she only received some level of notability in her geographical area, and then only for a relatively short time. Had she received national recognition, this vote might be different. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a local exception to the GNG I'm missing?
- Keep, passes WP:GNG per the sources given in the previous AFD. Juzhong (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per previous AfD, sources meeting GNG, and in the interest of countering anti-Ohio bias. :-)John Z (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep Meets GNG hands down. You can add [1] to the list too. Hobit (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.