Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Chaplin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Sandstein 10:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Chaplin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have the greatest admiration for Mr. Chaplin and his legacy, and only enormous respect for his work and history. Nevertheless, inasmuch as notability is something which is WP:NOTINHERITED, I feel compelled to nominate this article for deletion: Mrs. Chaplin lived and died, and there is ample evidence of her having existed— but the references given here appear to only mention her in passing or WP:TRIVIALly, and unless someone can come up with some references in which she is discussed in depth and separately from her son Charlie, she will not warrant a standalone article. It might also be acceptable for this article to be changed into a redirect to the article on Charlie.KDS4444 ^Talk 23:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Notability is not inherited. The king of the sun (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete perhaps if needed although I would've also considered Redirecting such as the Chaplin family article being an acceptable target. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An interesting article with a few sources that I can't access as they are books and not online. There are I think two editors who made substantial contributions to the article and who are still with us: Jack1956 and All Hallow's Wraith, and I think they should at least be invited to comment in this discussion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.