Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HAGGIS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sam Walton (talk) 00:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HAGGIS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This programming language fails WP:PRODUCT. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep So what? I would hope that no-one ever uses this horrible language. It is a bad language, badly designed for a bad purpose. That said, and where its notability stems from, the Scottish education authority has decided to impose it as a standard language upon all Scottish exam students. This is regrettable, but also notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The programming language is notable, no matter how terrible it is. -- Dane ^talk 01:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fairly significant and well referenced. scope_creep (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.