Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. William Vivanco-Mackie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

H. William Vivanco-Mackie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. There is a paucity of secondary sources that could contribute to an article about this person. User: LittleT889 (User talk: LittleT889) 10:11, 30 January 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be more widely circulated - he seems notable in Peru, but I am not fluent in Spanish NealeFamily (talk) 07:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a log page. Fixed now--no comment on the nomination. --Finngall ^talk 13:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A h-index of 1. Was "a member of" a cloning team. Nothing notable here. -- 120.17.55.37 (talk) 11:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Neither coverage nor actions establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.