Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gupta Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gupta Technologies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, all coverage is press releases by the company itself and release notes of their own products hosted on their own site. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was only able to find mentions of this company's technology, but nothing substantive. Lamona (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Pioneer in client-server databases and 4GL GUI development in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Since they pre-date the internet, references will come from old fashioned on-paper research. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Gupta was a big name in databases. Scans of Computerworld and Infoworld issues visible in Google Books show that the company and its products were extensively covered in that era. StarryGrandma (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This company was covered (usually under Centura Software Corp.) and profiled by various analyst groups such as Gartner, Forrester, Bloor, etc. For example, here's a link to a report from Bloor, here's another recent report - there's lots of reports but mostly under the name Centura. In my opinion, this topic should really be Centura Software and Gupta redirected there. HighKing 17:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.