Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Manhattan Mystery Conclave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great Manhattan Mystery Conclave

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in the sourcing indicates that this article meets the notability criteria for organizations. A recent comment in the history said: do not redirect without a clear consensus on talk. or go to articles for deletion [1]. Since there is no ideal target for a redirect, I'm bringing it here. Vexations (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not appear to be sufficiently notable. Polyamorph (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-per nom.Best Regards.---✨Lazy Maniik✨ 05:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user Lazy Maniik. ✗plicit 14:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Same as my edit summary when I tagged this, Google news searches with quotes yields no results, as did several other searches, except for a few mentions in the forwards of a few mystery novels, this is lacking in significant coverage unless there are sources we are missing. ASUKITE 14:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of any SIGCOV from reliable sources in the article.Brayan ocaner (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.