Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Sultans Of Excess
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Grand Sultans Of Excess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of significance; claim is barely significant enough to avoid speedy deletion. PROD tag was removed without comment or improvement by a single-edit IP. —Swpbtalk 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. —Swpbtalk 14:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Swpbtalk 14:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —Swpbtalk 14:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - can't find any independent secondary sources at all. JMWt (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as I simply found nothing better, not even generally notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm prepared to argue that any established New Orleans Krewe is notable, but not for similar less- well-known festivities elsewhere. DGG ( talk ) 08:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.