Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grain of Sand (Fictional Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to I'm Not There. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grain of Sand (Fictional Film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a "film" which exists only as a fictional plot point within another film, with no reliable sourcing or real-world context to demonstrate a reason why it would warrant a standalone article as a separate topic from its parent film. Wikipedia is not a fan site on which every individual plot point in a film automatically warrants its own separate article, and the only "sources" here are the parent film itself, and a review of that parent film which contains only minimal content about the film-within-a-film -- so this topic should certainly be discussed in the article on I'm Not There, but nothing here warrants a separate article about this. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into I'm Not There. Very little independent coverage of this "film within a film", and nothing worth putting in a separate article. crh23 (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect as it's actually not currently mentioned there and there's simply nothing to suggest an independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Something to be careful about with merging is that a lot of this seems to be written from the specific viewpoint of the editor and as such, really comes across strongly as WP:OR. It's also sourced heavily to only this review of I'm Not There, so there'd need to be other sources as well. I'm not against merging, just saying that this needs a lot of work and judgement before merging some of this information into the parent article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge cautiously into I'm Not There, per Tokyogirl79. Bishonen | talk 18:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Fictional Films. Jclemens (talk) 04:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.