Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gogetair Aviation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gogetair Aviation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company was founded in 2019, and has produced ten "2 seater aircraft". Fails WP:NCORP. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 23:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the

following topics: Companies, Aviation, and Slovenia. Shellwood (talk) 00:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only three references, two of them are the company's website itself and the other is YouTube, which is not reliable. --interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP as it stands. - Ahunt (talk) 00:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Notification of the existence of this AfD has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt (talk) 10:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Gogetair G750 and re-purpose. Although most information about this type is only on the company's website, Facebook and YouTube presences, other sites do refer to it and it does appear to be a bona fide aircraft type which is, or has been, in small-scale production. As such, by longstanding consensus of the Aviation WikiProject, it is notable per WP:AIRNOTE and, for a fuller account, WP:NAIR. Even if online RS are hard to find with a search engine, it is sure to appear in reputable directories, national registration databases and the like. Since the company is only notable through its aircraft, it does not deserve an article of its own. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.