Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geek Chic (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 23:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Geek Chic (book)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK; there's no significant coverage to be found. None of the authors seem to be notable, either. Unsourced stub. Lennart97 (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Looking through Google and The Wikipedia Library revealed only a single source, where there is only a mention of the book. Isabelle ^🔔 11:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.