Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flanor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 01:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flanor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A tiny, home-based, non-notable publishing house. Some of their authors are individually notable and published their main work elsewhere. Fails WP:NORG. WP:NOTINHERETED also seems to apply. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This article was created and developed by its principal, who is a blocked sockpuppeteer at nlwiki.[1][2] Nlwiki has twice deleted its equivalent.[3]. A nomination of the principal was initiated by another user. If WH survives this nomination, Flanor can be redirected there. gidonb (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did not survive hence the red link above. It basically leads to this discussion. gidonb (talk) 13:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.