Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finmo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 22:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Finmo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet the notability standards set out at WP:COMPANY, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH. Sourcing is poor and better sourcing doesn't appear to be available. Written in a folksy, PR way that makes it appear as if a company representative created the article. Marquardtika (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO. This content belongs on the company's web site, not here, i.e. this language: "The secret sauce here is the Social Feed..." -- seriously? K.e.coffman (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- 'Delete - Fails WP:COMPANY - No Third party coverage cited at all - the first reference is a companies house listing - so it exists, but that doesn't make it notable, the second is their own blog, the third was issued by the company "We wish to create an entire ecosystem ..." and the fourth doesn't mention them at all - Arjayay (talk) 18:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Fails COMPANY, PROMO, GNG (external coverage) South Nashua (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.