Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faraaz Kazi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Faraaz Kazi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources are only interviews or self written pieces which should not be independent sources. It is also written like a complete advertisement. Previous discussion in 2013. I don't see pages created these days allowed with such minimal coverage. Glassesgalore123 (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Glassesgalore123 (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, sources used aren't proper RS and don't establish WPGNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of sources that meet the requirements of WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.