Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/False Memory (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 11:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False Memory (novel)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about obscure novel by famous writer, with information from the limited-edition publisher and a long plot summary, but that's it! Their is neither evidence nor assertion of notability in any way. Orange Mike | Talk 09:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added a Reception section with citations to reviews of the novel, published in the Los Angeles Times, Publishers Weekly, The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, Library Journal, Booklist, and Kirkus Reviews. Meets WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. DanCherek (talk) 12:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Appears to comfortably meet WP:BOOKCRIT, with reviews in Publisher's Weekly, Kirkus Reviews, Library Journal, Booklist and The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction. Some of the sources added to the article do not have links to them, so AGF regarding these sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - More than enough reviews, as shown above, to pass WP:NBOOK. Rorshacma (talk) 16:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, another WP:NBOOK slamdunk with multiple reviews, can nominators please at least do a perfunctory WP:BEFORE?, looking at the ISFDB entry, which we all go to for novels of this genre, (here) shows a listing of reviews by Fangoria, Locus, The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, and Talebones , let alone going to any of the US library system sites like WCCLS (here) that shows even more reviews (most brought out above and incorporated into article, a thankyou to DanCherek for that), whats even worse about this afd is the experience of the nominator! (rant over, coola will now go back to slumberland:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 03:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, WP:NBOOK is met and has received enough reviews to make it hard to argue for a deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.