Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyesofsound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eyesofsound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the general notability guideline (this article received several "problem templates" a year ago, and since then no improvements were made). Canniba loki 01:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 07:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They appear to have signed several notable bands, maybe it could be rejigged as a "list of bands signed by Eyesofsound". Polarpanda (talk) 13:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 17:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This company doesn't meet WP:CORP at first glance, but because it's a record label, I think significant coverage of the subject may be comprised of coverage of notable bands being signed to that record label. As such, I will add sources and vote to keep. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.