Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expedyte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expedyte

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Un-notable "company", operational for just over a year. Very little mention in independent reliable sources, with the only references in the article being product listings that are not indicators of notability. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 17:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As written, clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations). We are not Yellow Pages. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 17:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software developer article of unclear notability, lacking independent, reliable source refs. Links provided are developers' pages and download pages and do not establish notability. A search did not reveal any significant RS coverage. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.