Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excentric Muzik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fergie (DJ)#Record Labels. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excentric Muzik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because it does not have links to reliable sources. None of the references provided discuss the record label in significant detail. In short, it fails WP:GNG versace1608 (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article's content appears to have been copied from the first reference; I'm not finding significant coverage for this label elsewhere on the web. At best, since it was founded by a notable DJ, I have no strong objection to a redirect to Fergie (DJ)#Record Labels. Gong show 20:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fergie (DJ)#Record Labels. No independent notability evidenced from article or from search for cites. Also, entire article is COPYVIO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article is quite confusing, includes the artist name Spectre too often. Tried an edit but don't know how to handle it any further. Beatport Link doesn't include label section, Article has no categories. Probably including copryright infringement... --Saviour1981 (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.