Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endgame360

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endgame360

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that fails to meet WP:NORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search turns up press releases, directories and self published primary sources all of which are not considered reliable. Needless to say WP:ORGDEPTH is not met, not even remotely. Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have made much the same findings as are mentioned in the nomination statement. None of the sources in the article could be classified as in-depth, relabel and independent. The same goes for what I have found online (mostly press releases). WP:GNG/WP:COMPANY are not met. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete They are listed on Inc5000, but that alone is not enough. They don't seem to have good in-depth articles and Google search brings up many of their own articles. Should someone provide better citations, things might be different. Chelokabob (talk) 23:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage indicating notability per WP:NORG. Such-change47 (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NORG, lacks significant coverage. Juggyevil (talk) 20:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable organization that fails to satisfy NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.