Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Cleasby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Cleasby

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor bio Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Poor sourcing, serves only to promote the actress–it's not encyclopedicly informative. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 20:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG. LizardJr8 (talk) 04:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fail to pass WP:NACTOR/WP:GNG. RPSkokie (talk) 04:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I couldn't even find a source to confirm her alma mater. Gargleafg (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.