Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Brocket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) DanCherek (talk) 05:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Brocket

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Not very notable, and there only appears to be one good source. Almost nothing is known about their life, and the death date is an 11-year span.~~ It appears since they were a Member of Parliament, they are considered notable - I withdraw this AfD. Wgullyn (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Member of Parliament. The one source is highly authoritative and itself well sourced, and gives a lot more info about his life. PamD 14:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Member of Parliament. Djflem (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NPOL as a member of Parliament. --Enos733 (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw per WP:SNOW. Wgullyn (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.