Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edureka (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:58, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edureka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorial with only the selectively specific information of a press release thus our fundamental policies apply, WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Deletion policy; the arguments previously said are essentially It's important and or There's sourcing but the fundamental policies outweigh this entirely. Once we accept promotional articles where press releases are cited and the information is trivial, it's not satisfying the criteria of an encyclopedia article and the last 2 deletions say this equally well. Source 10 is especially a questionable one as to what "Coolest" actually signifies. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article is heavily promotional in tone. Alexius08 (talk) 10:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- promotion for an unremarkable private company that is just going about its business. The awards listed are not significant and well known. Sources do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, so "delete". K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.