Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edition Axel Menges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edition Axel Menges

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tagged since 2011, apparently written by one of the co-founders. Cites no sources, and the external links don't help support the content either. I don't see evidence of WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. asilvering (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. asilvering (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and is written a little bit like an advertisement. The sources for the article are not secondary, independent, or reliable. Because of this it is really hard to say it’s notable. Just because an organization exists does not mean it is notable. I tried to find something that would make this article notable but couldn't. The book publisher does get cited but the citations are for the books it prints not for the publisher. For example https://www.archdaily.com/977462/is-fake-the-new-real-searching-for-an-architectural-reality and ciation 41 in https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05439-w. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 06:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Small publisher/imprint, uncontroversially fails WP:GNG; WP:ORG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.