Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXPIRE act
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- EXPIRE act (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG - one of any number of legislative proposals that failed to be enacted. Fails WP:SUSTAINED as lacking significant and ongoing coverage in reliable sources. There a few and passing mentions only. Not a sufficiently significant milestone to warrant an article outside the Congressional Record. Geoff | Who, me? 19:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, a failed proposal. NN. Refs aren't saying much. Szzuk (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, does not appear to be notable for a standalone article. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.