Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EUROTAI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EUROTAI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Does not have an article in another language, i.e. Turkish. I'm sending to AfD rather than prod because this might be an easy one to have missed something on. Boleyn (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 00:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep, I dont think not having a correspondng article is a must. Pass a Method talk 17:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is not a must, but it is important to look for corresponding articles as they can contain useful information. What are your reasons for voting that this is notable User:Pass a Method? Boleyn (talk) 19:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
keep Although the article doesn't reflect it, the venture is notable. Co operates with Turkish Aerospace Industries. 1 2 3 4--Kafkasmurat (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.