Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMEIA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A1/A3 applied also, hardly any content. Secret ^account 04:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EMEIA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term is specific to Ernst and Young initiative. Gaurav Pruthi ^talk 08:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. No indication of significance. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 21:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any criteria for speedy deletion that apply, but I also don't see any reason to keep this. It is not even a definition; it is the expansion of an abbreviation. Either merge to Europe, the Middle East and Africa (though that page itself is borderline; see this 2004 deletion discussion) or delete. Cnilep (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.