Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driver DR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Driver DR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable software. Refs are from download sites Staszek Lem (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Normally I wouldn't mind Cnet if it was a review, but that aside there is nothing out there that is indepth. This one was recently released and while some newer released software gets quite a bit of press, this one has not. Fails WP:GNG.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete- 40 million windows users needing old drivers updated might want to find info on this tool. This means 40 million windows users donating the price of a cup of coffee to keep the lights on. It's only marginally notable, but could be improved. The problem with new software is it can gain critical mass quickly. I'd tag the article, leave it around for 30-60 days, then resubmit for Afd if it does not look to have a critical mass of interest. If and when this software gains more interest, we can recreate it if this is the case. DangerDogWest (talk) 06:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the problem is, people who may "want to find info on this tool" will need to look at Wikipedia as it is the only site that has any substantial information on it. That being said, Wikipedia is not a place to host information. It is a collection of knowledge. Wikipedia does not keep articles around and hope they gain notability. Quite the opposite. Article should be deleted and then if it begins to gain "critical mass of interest" as you suggest, then the article could possibly be recreated. However, I am more than willing to change my vote if you can show me significant coverage in reliable sources, the cornerstone of notability.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NSOFT. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.