Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnalyn Bartolome (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 13:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Donnalyn Bartolome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. No independent reliable sources. Ctrlwiki • 13:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ctrlwiki • 13:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ctrlwiki • 13:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Ctrlwiki • 13:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. It seems like the nominator didn't read WP:BEFORE before nominating the article. Having found several independent and reliable sources on Google (Inquirer, GMA News, Rappler, Manila Bulletin, ABS-CBN News), I would say the subject passes the GNG. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NARTIST with sources presented by HueMan. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 05:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.