Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominion (1995 film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dominion (1995 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM.
PROD removed because "added citation and the actors in the film all have wikipedia aritcles."
However, the citations listed are a listing at a video collector's site, Rotten Tomatoes...which has 0 critic reviews, and TCM which is just a database. As for all the actors having Wikipedia articles, Notability is not inherited WP:NOTINHERITED. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- As the creator of the article, I believe the article warrants deletion. I had mistakenly gone with the "inherited notability" princiiple, since quite a few high-profile performers starred in the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooonswimmer (talk • contribs) 15:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The article is also available on Ukrainian Wiki. Brascoian (talk to me) 16:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You can see first revision and you can see current revision i have improved the article by alot. Brascoian (talk to me) 16:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Brascoian, how is anything you've said above relevant to the notability concern voiced by the nominator? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Brascoian, being on another language's wiki does not warrant automatic inclusion on every wiki. Notability must be established, which, even in the current revision, it has not. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Each Wikipedia has different notability rules, so being kept in a discussion on one Wikipedia does not gaurantee being kept on another. For example, at least at one point the Polish Wikipedia considered every university professor notable. We have never embraced such an inclusive standard.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; fails WP:NFILM. Entries on other Wikipedia language editions is not grounds for notability. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I tried looking for coverage in newspapers.com, as well as in a general search but couldn't find anything. I suppose I could go through my college database, but I'm not finding anything that would give me any faith that there would be coverage there, particularly as Newspapers.com would be the most likely outlet to find coverage of a 90s film. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 16:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Donaldd23. Shoestringnomad (talk) 16:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.