Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney International HD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 18:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disney International HD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only cover in entertainment media, TV Post, Indian Television and bestmediaifo. Per Notability nutshell: "..world at large and over a period of time...", niche media sources doesn't constitute the "world at large". This can be incubated in the The Walt Disney Company India article or as a draft until suitable notable sources can be found. Spshu (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- There are articles about way more obscure tv channels, why don't put those up for deletion?--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Second guessing nomination of it for deletion is not a reason. Any one can nominate obscure TV channels for deletion. Why didn't you? Spshu (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This is an Indian channel, and has a good amount of coverage on Indian media. it does not always have to be mentioned by huge media sources. User 261115 (talk) 21:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- The Indian television market is not mainly covered by the media of that country. Because of that, it's actually predictable to see TV/Entertainment-centred websites talking about the channel as references instead of general major news sites. Though Twitter not being a reliable source, the channel even has its own account there with advertisements from the channel prior to its launch. Aside from that, ads for the channel have appeared on some newspapers across India (this being an example) and even a mention to the network's name appear on the official Indian corporate site. --Bankster (talk) 00:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Disney's (or the channel's) Twitter, Disney's website and ads are invalid as it is Self-promotion and publicity (WP:SPIP). Spshu (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While so far all the !votes have been unanimous keeps, there isn't much citing of policy or reliable sources going on yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Obviously; you get a big name to take over a channel in India we're not going to delete it. Disney is one of those 'we don't delete' cases for sure. And we work with what media sources we can get on this. Nate • (chatter) 02:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is an Indian TV channel. HindWiki (Love My India) • Talk to Hindustani ! 09:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.