Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital strategy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Digital strategy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This poorly sourced article is a rambling essay about nothing much. It disguises its banality in a bewildering fog of marketing buzzwords. Most of the sources are blogs and/or seem unrelated. Although I can find hits for the phrase "digital strategy" it is difficult to determine if they are related because this article is so vague and confusing and, frequently, so are those hits. Reyk _YO! 14:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What an irredeemable mess of messy wikilinks, stream-of-consciousness ramblings and corporate bollockspeak - needs nuking with extreme prejudice. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:OR, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:TNT. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Definitely an WP:OR. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The topic "digital strategy" and associated "digital transformation" are notable topics with many books and articles devoted to them. However, the article is very badly written, with synthesis and original research throughout. I rarely recommend deletion based on article quality, but this is an instance where it is warranted. Because this is a notable topic, I have no prejudice to re-creating a better written and better sourced version of the article. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 17:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.