Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Didi Zindabad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 04:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond Didi Zindabad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. With the exception of one source, everything falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Churnalism and press releases as well as no-bylined articles. CNMall41 (talk) 07:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Bangladesh, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 07:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zee_Bangla#Drama_series -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There is not even a newspaper name under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. And the page is well notable. So I think it needs to be kept.

103.127.222.50 (talk) 08:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - By checking the reference, you will understand that the coverages are very significant. Besides, no reference of Newspaper under WP:NEWSORGINDIA has been used here. Nilpriyo (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No GNG whatsoever. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- These references [[1]],

[[2]],[[3]] clearly passes WP:GNG.103.102.136.170 (talk) 20:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please review newly located sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lacks GNG. Ednabrenze (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - You can see the page with Review, I have added many important references. Which is able to pass 100% WP:GNG. User:Nilpriyo (talk) 8:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you point out which one(s) out of what you added are reliable? I checked the first two from the TOI and both are unreliable and fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA based on a recent RSN discussion. The bylines are "TOI Entertainment Desk." --CNMall41 (talk) 15:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The cited sources are press releases, so not independent (zee5, editorji, ottplay, timesofindia); have no reputation for accuracy or fact checking (prothomkolkata, tollytales, khabor24x7, calcuttastory); or, although from legitimate news outlets and sometimes having a byline, are almost entirely based on coming-soon promotional materials (eisamay, aajkaal, hindustantimes). The greatest degree of independent analysis beyond a recap of the plot as revealed by promos is a mere two sentences in aajkaal. Searches did not find better sources, so not remotely notable. I'm disinclined in this case to redirect as an WP:ATD because of the extent of promotional editing around Zee Bangla TV series. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.