Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delayed judgement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delayed judgement

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no reason this article should exist. Notability WP:NOTINHERITED. PepperBeast (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't find any coverage. Article is referenced with only a single source, which is a primary reference. Notability is not met. The saying can be mentioned in book's article, but it does not require its own article.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 17:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG. Searching the phrase alongside the authors name or keywords such as self-help and psychology yields zero relevant results on Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar, Google News Archive, Newspapers.com, and the Internet Archive. The phrase can also mean a delayed judgement in any circumstance and was not coined by or exclusively used by Sean Covey so I'm not sure a redirect to The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens is even appropriate. TipsyElephant (talk) 21:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.