Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dapper Denver Dooley
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Woody Woodpecker (film series). Wanted to give this another 24 hours to get some more feedback. I think redirecting is the best - thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dapper Denver Dooley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable cartoon character. Article is currently unsourced and I can't find evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Woody Woodpecker is a good soft delete and redirect target. Hog Farm (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable character.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe Merge into a "Characters" section in Woody Woodpecker (film series)? Toughpigs (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect or smerge to Woody Woodpecker (film series) sounds fine. All there really is to say is that he was an antagonist; his individual appearances are already borderline cruft. – sgeureka t•c 10:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect - The article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 12:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per toughpigs as this subject is not too far from becoming notable now. NHS2008 (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, Redirect or merge - I'm willing to give the article a chance, since Dapper Denver Dooley appeared in a number of Woody Woodpecker cartoons (and a Chilly Willy cartoon), but would also be Ok with a merge too. I think the only WW rivals most people really know are Wally Walrus and Buzz Buzzard (maybe Gabby Gator}. Also, Woody's main cartoons known to people were from 1940-1955, late 1959-1962 and the last one released in theaters. DDD cartoons appearances were in a not-to-notable period.--Halls4521 (talk) 23:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Woody Woodpecker (film series). The article fails WP:GNG, the only sourced website being nothing more than a listing of episodes. There is nothing in the article worth merging. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Woody Woodpecker (film series). Not notable. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.