Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger Boy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danger Boy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this article about a book series meets WP:NBOOK. In carrying out WP:BEFORE I found and added an interview with the author, but I still think this is too thin. Tacyarg (talk) 22:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 22:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 22:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, first, the books (including e-versions) in this series are still held in around 200 libraries (Ancient Fire, Dragon Sword, Trail of Bones, City of Ruins), second, there are enough reviews of a couple of them to meet WP:NBOOK ie. multiple reviews, entitling them to standalone articles; Ancient Fire - by Publishers Weekly here, Booklist here, School Library Journal here; City of Ruins by School Library Journal, and Horn Book here, and the Jewish Book Council here, alternatively, these reviews could be used to flesh out this series article. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the sources listed above seem like more than enough for notability. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 04:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.