Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Nuccitelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Nuccitelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable blogger, searched for sources but found nothing, sources I found were removed - Mosfetfaser (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- fails WP:BIO. It works out, strangely, that the nomination is correct even though the person nominating it is the same person who just created it. (Also despite the failure of logic: "I didn't find any sources, and I'm annoyed that the ones I've found are being deleted"). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- fails WP:BIO. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 26. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 18:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I was trying to help out User:Mosfetfaser with formatting the stub. Nuccitelli is pretty well-known in the climate blogosphere, but I think it would be hard to make a good case for his wiki-notability. --Pete Tillman (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Maybe you could help the contributor for a speedy deletion. Regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.