Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DPT Labs (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2013 February 12. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- DPT Labs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable obscure corporation; we don't even have an article for its parent company, DFB Pharmaceuticals. Orange Mike | Talk 21:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - an AfD from 2 months ago voted keep and the company seems reasonably notable from the sources I saw in said AfD. Lukeno94 (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- information The creator and main editor of this article says that "Our client" has plans for the company; but has never, anywhere that I can see, admitted to their COI. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this could be considered a COI declaration. --Drm310 (talk) 22:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- True, but on somebody else's talk page is not where we warn COI editors to notify folks that they have a COI. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 16:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable company. fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —cyberpower ChatLimited Access 18:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.