Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credible Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Credible Labs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears well referenced, but if you actually look at the references, you will discover that except for the ones that are mere notices, the proprietor of the firm wrote all of them(eg. Huffington Post) , or dictated the contents to an "interviewer" (eg CBS). DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - did you actually look at the sources? This one in the International Business Times from 2012 was not written by him, and neither was this 2015 profile here in American Banker. (That one is behind a paywall but you can see author's name). Neither of those are "mere notices" either. The articles about its financing and the award it got at LAUNCH help notability too. Article needs to be depuffed but I don't see why it fails notability. —Мандичка^YO 😜 09:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep Credible, secondary sources, also the fact that most of the sources were not, in fact, written by him.~~ SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure because News, (nothing at Books and thefreelibrary), browser (keep to mind, browser only found 4 pages of results) and highbeam (one link, American Banker) all add to not many sources. It's worth noting that NerdWallet is a passing mention so, all in all, this has received somewhat decent attention and one award and is neat and sourced but I'm not sure if it's outstandingly notable as they could be getting more coverage. If at all, I'll probably say delete for now and wait for additional future coverage. @Wikimandia: What are your thoughts about this? SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SwisterTwister: The Google search links you posted are all searching for the specific term "Credible JoinStampede Stephen Dash" ... did you mean to search for that term? If you click at the links at the top it should search only for Credible Labs —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikimandia: I usually actually search myself and try to be as detailed as possible because I thought "Credible" and "Credible Labs" wouldn't get much. I don't often use the links above but it seems still not much. SwisterTwister talk 15:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.