Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collegemarching.com
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Notability not established by those asking for retention. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Collegemarching.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable website lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are brief mentions of site. reddogsix (talk) 17:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the references (other than the primary source [1] ) are trivial or image-credits at best. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Aside from references in multiple mainstream news sources, two of the sources are about ideas specific to marchingband. Subuey (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The only sources do not cover the website itself, they simply cite the website. The website itself does not appear to have garnered the attention necessary for web content to be considered notable. It may be that the website will become notable later. Malinaccier (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.