Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoDominium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep but possibly rename or merge. There's no argument to delete the content, and the conversation as to where and under what name can continue editorially. Star Mississippi 18:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CoDominium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been tagged as in need of more citations since 2009, and PRIMARY/INUNIVERSE since 2014. The article is divided into a listing of the books in the series and then a plot summary. It has nothing on reception/significance of the series. My BEFORE yielded little. There are quite a few passing mentions, but sadly, snippet view due to copyright restrictions prevented me from following on all, but I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV (although it's possible copyright snippetting is cutting off something useful :( ). A few works like [1] or [2] seem to provide a short plot summary. This seem to have some analysis of a few books in the series (I think those). The series probably does warrant som mention somewhere, probably in Jerry Pournelle (where it is not discussed except as 'see also'!), but I am afraid what we have here merits WP:TNT. Perhaps we could save the table (list of works), which could be merged to Jerry_Pournelle#Bibliography, but unless someone can add a reception/significance section, I am afraid this cannot be kept as a stand-alone article. Ping User:ReaderofthePack, User:Daranios, User:TompaDompa - do prove me wrong if you can find something to rescue this. PS. We also have an article on a subseries, War World (series), which is in about the same bad shape and at minimum, a merge is likely needed. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I've found enough to where this would pass, but haven't gone through the whole list of books just yet. The bigger thing to look at will be which of the novels are independently notable, which will take some time because of the amount of books and the fact that the majority of sources will be either not online or hidden behind paywalls. I also need to look into the subseries, but I have a feeling that will likely need to be merged. This still needs a lot of work but notability has been secured. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 14:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @ReaderofthePack Thanks. Just a question: you've added some sources suggesting notability for individual books (reviews) but I am still not seeing anything about the series/universe? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I made a custom Google search thing awhile back to check for websites that are listed as reliable sources for book reviews. https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=000940472126197254432:ojqph5ir04q Dream Focus 03:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.