Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitral Vision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 01:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chitral Vision

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The only source is Urdu Wikipedia, and no further sources can be found based on a Google search. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 15:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added other sources and links to this article, please do not delete. Shahabdulaziz (talk) 07:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC) — Shahabdulaziz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Please do not delete this article as this article is about the Pakistani Literary Assciation -- Zaheeruddin25 (talk) 04:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is notable, please do not delete this --Mirajbibi (talk) 04:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: I ran the reflinks tool on the new references added, but those are not independent and reliable. I also ran a more thorough search than a Google search and I too could not find any more sources. However, I added the photo of Rehmat Aziz Chitrali receiving the Shandoor Award and that makes this paper an award winner, which is minimal for a keep. I would suggest that the article be merged with a redirect into Chitrali's until more sources can be found.Crtew (talk) 10:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm in favor of a low bar to notability for newspapers and other publications. Publications, by their nature, are not the subject of coverage by other publications — their competitors. We have the same problem at AfD with establishing the notability of journalists, who are not "covered" by competing "independent sources." We just need to accept this fact and move along. IAR Keep, the encyclopedia is better of with this material than without it and this is the sort of information that should be in a comprehensive encyclopedia. Bear in mind that available sourcing out there is apt to be in Urdu. Good luck with that. Carrite (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.