Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Sandstein 22:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chanto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I’d like to present the Chanto article for deletion, and open to the guidance that may be received from the editors that will be contributing towards this discussion. I have reviewed and followed the steps outlined on nominating article(s) for deletion and would like to confirm the following:

The proposed deletion for this article was contested for reasons that other language sources may exist, but none have been provided.
Despite efforts to improve the article through reliable sources, my research has not yet been successful in identifying alternative sources contrary to the suggestion provided by the contesting editor.
The article has been flagged for over nine years for not meeting the general notability guidelines
The credible claim of significance is arguable. Journey of Learning (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.