Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgwater science festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgwater science festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This event fails WP:GNG. Google News search returns just one hit [1], and that one just mentions the festival in passing. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The involvement of people from two universities and a town council means there should have been significant coverage in independent secondary sources, even if they were local or regional newspapers. I found an article about the 2014 festival. Roches (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~delete - fails notability standards. DangerDogWest (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.