Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boomer lit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 02:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer lit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reflects a literary genre that doesn't exist. It’s a tag on Goodreads. Google Scholar returns nothing of note other than one article which mentions the Goodreads page. — ImaginesTigers (talkcontribs) 23:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — ImaginesTigers (talkcontribs) 23:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What does this have to do with inherited notability? KidAdSPEAK 16:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KidAd: My guess is that they mean notability isn't inherited, in this case, from matron literature. — ImaginesTigers (talkcontribs) 17:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.